Meet CMMC Level 1 With an Annual Self-Assessment - FCI Safeguarding for DoD Contracts

CMMC Level 1 Compliance for DoD Federal Contractors Safeguarding FCI With No CUI

If your contracts involve Federal Contract Information (FCI) but no Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI), you’re required to meet CMMC Level 1 through an annual self-assessment aligned to FAR 52.204-21, not a C3PAO audit. SecureITSM helps you implement the 15 safeguarding practices, document policies and procedures, and submit MET/NOT MET results with a defensible annual affirmation in SPRS. You stay eligible for DoD work while operating with strong cyber hygiene year round with no compliance gaps created by light documentation.

No CUI Doesn’t Mean No Compliance Responsibility

You Don’t Handle CUI — But You Still Must Protect Federal Contract Information (FCI)

If your organization supports DoD contracts but does not process Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI), CMMC Level 1 applies. That means no C3PAO audit but it does require documented safeguards, annual self assessment, and formal affirmation in SPRS. Failure to protect FCI can still result in contract risk, findings, or enforcement action.

1

CMMC Level 1 Is Self-Assessment Based

You are required to meet FAR 52.204-21 and affirm compliance annually not undergo an external audit.

2

FCI Still Requires Protection

Federal Contract Information includes pricing data, schedules, technical deliverables, and contract communications that must be safeguarded.

3

Evidence Still Matters

You must be able to demonstrate that controls exist, are implemented, and are operating, not just claimed.

4

SPRS Submission Is Mandatory

Annual self-assessment results must be accurately submitted and maintained in the Supplier Performance Risk System.

Baseline Cybersecurity Obligations for Federal Contractors

What CMMC Level 1 Requires — And What Contractors Must Enforce

Our integrated security platform provides end-to-end protection, monitoring, and incident response capabilities to keep your business safe from evolving cyber threats.

Enforce
1

Access Control (AC)..

Organizations must restrict system access to authorized users, limit functions based on role, and prevent unauthorized access to FCI.

This includes account provisioning, session controls, and basic least-privilege enforcement across systems that store or transmit FCI.

2

Identification & Authentication (IA)..

Unique user identification and authentication mechanisms must be enforced for all system users.

Shared credentials, weak passwords, and unmanaged identities are non-compliant. Authentication must reliably link activity to a specific individual.

3

Media Protection (MP)..

Contractors must control how removable media is used, stored, transported, and disposed of.

This includes preventing unauthorized copying of FCI and ensuring proper sanitization or destruction of media when no longer required.

4

Physical Protection (PE)..

Physical access to systems processing FCI must be restricted to authorized personnel.

Facilities, workstations, and devices must be protected against unauthorized physical access that could compromise FCI.

5

System & Communications Protection (SC)..

Organizations must protect FCI during transmission, enforce boundary protections, and prevent unauthorized system connections.

This includes basic network segmentation, secure communications, and protection against external access pathways.

6

System & Information Integrity (SI)..

Systems must be protected from malicious code, monitored for security alerts, and updated to correct known vulnerabilities.

Integrity controls ensure FCI is not altered, corrupted, or accessed improperly during normal operations.

CMMC Level 1 — Practical Execution Gaps

Why CMMC Level 1 Is Still Difficult for Small Defense Contractors

While CMMC Level 1 removes the C3PAO audit requirement, it does not remove enforceable obligations under FAR 52.204-21. For many small defense contractors, the operational and compliance burden is significantly underestimated until affirmation time.

Operational Challenges Contractors Face

Ambiguous Federal Contract Information (FCI) Boundaries

Ambiguous Federal Contract Information (FCI) Boundaries

FCI often extends beyond obvious contract files into email communications, collaboration platforms, ticketing systems, and third-party SaaS tools.

Without a defensible system boundary, contractors risk under-protecting in-scope data or over-scoping their environment unnecessarily.

Evidence Creation Is Still Required

Evidence Creation Is Still Required

CMMC Level 1 does not allow “policy-only” compliance.

Controls must be implemented, operating, and demonstrable. If evidence is requested, internally or by the DoD contractors must be able to show configuration, access enforcement, and control execution.

Self-Assessment Scoring Uncertainty

Self-Assessment Scoring Uncertainty

Without technical validation, contractors struggle to score controls accurately.

Over-scoring creates false affirmation risk, while under-scoring can negatively impact contract eligibility. FAR 52.204-21 leaves little room for interpretation without supporting evidence.

SPRS Errors and Incomplete Submissions

SPRS Errors and Incomplete Submissions

Annual self-assessments must be correctly submitted and maintained in SPRS.

Incomplete documentation, unsupported scores, or inconsistent affirmations introduce regulatory exposure and potential contractual consequences.

No Centralized Compliance System of Record

No Centralized Compliance System of Record

Many organizations rely on spreadsheets, screenshots, and tribal knowledge.

Without a centralized compliance record tied to real system configurations, claims cannot be validated, maintained, or defended over time.

Designed for Small Defense Contractors

A Low-Cost, Low-Effort Path to CMMC Level 1 Compliance

SecureITSM delivers a purpose built compliance path for DoD contractors that handle Federal Contract Information (FCI) only. Our approach eliminates unnecessary tools, reduces cost, and ensures your self-assessment and SPRS submission are technically accurate, defensible, and repeatable.

Low cost featured
1

FCI Scope Validation.

We define and validate where Federal Contract Information exists across email, file storage, collaboration tools, and systems establishing a defensible compliance boundary aligned to FAR 52.204-21.

2

Policy & Procedure Documentation.

Required policies and procedures are created and aligned directly to implemented safeguards, ensuring documentation reflects reality,not aspirational controls.

3

Control Implementation Verification.

We confirm that all 15 Level 1 safeguards are fully implemented and operating, eliminating gaps that lead to false or unsupported affirmations .

4

Self-Assessment Support.

Our team guides control scoring and interpretation to prevent overstatement, misclassification, or misalignment with assessment objectives.

5

SPRS Submission Guidance.

We ensure your SPRS entry is complete, accurate, and evidence-supported reducing contractual and regulatory risk.

6

Annual Affirmation Support.

Senior official affirmations are backed by documented controls and repeatable processes, supporting long-term compliance sustainability.

Dod contracts
DoD Contract Eligibility & Enforcement Impact

What CMMC Level 1 Means for Your DoD Contracts

CMMC Level 1 is not advisory. For DoD suppliers and federal subcontractors handling Federal Contract Information (FCI), it is a mandatory contractual requirement that directly affects eligibility, visibility, and accountability.

Operational & Contractual Impact

  • 1. Mandatory for New DoD Awards (Effective Nov 2025)

    CMMC Level 1 will be embedded in new DoD contracts beginning November 10, 2025. Contractors without a valid self-assessment and SPRS submission risk disqualification during award evaluation.

  • 2. Visible Compliance Status in SPRS

    Self-assessment results and affirmations are recorded in the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS), where they are accessible to DoD acquisition officials and primes during contract review.

  • 3. No Audit — But Legal Accountability Remains

    Although a C3PAO audit is not required, senior official affirmation is legally binding. False or unsupported claims expose contractors to enforcement action, termination risk, and False Claims Act scrutiny.

  • 4. Foundation for Future CMMC Level 2

    Level 1 establishes the compliance baseline required to progress to Level 2 for contracts involving CUI. Early compliance reduces future remediation cost and schedule risk.

Midsize defense

Why This Matters for Small & Mid-Sized Defense Contractors

CMMC Level 1 compliance determines whether your organization can:

  • Bid on future DoD work
  • Maintain subcontractor eligibility
  • Withstand contract reviews or inquiries
  • Progress confidently toward Level 2 when required

This is compliance that impacts revenue, not just security posture.

Designed for the Defense Industrial Base

Who This CMMC Level 1 Compliance Path Is Built For

CMMC Level 1 is purpose built for DoD contractors and subcontractors that handle Federal Contract Information (FCI) but do not process Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI).

Detect & Log Compliance Gaps

Detect & Log Compliance Gaps

Organizations performing DoD work where FCI exists in email, files, or collaboration tools but CUI is contractually excluded. This path ensures FAR 52.204-21 compliance without unnecessary over scoping.

Manufacturers & Service Providers Supporting DoD Programs.

Manufacturers & Service Providers Supporting DoD Programs.

Engineering firms, logistics providers, IT vendors, and specialty manufacturers that must safeguard contract data while keeping operational overhead low.

Federal Subcontractors.

Federal Subcontractors.

Tier-2 and Tier-3 suppliers required to affirm compliance in SPRS to maintain eligibility under prime contracts and flow down requirements.

Small Businesses in the Defense Industrial Base (DIB).

Small Businesses in the Defense Industrial Base (DIB).

Organizations without dedicated compliance teams that still require accurate self assessments, defensible evidence, and risk-aware affirmations.

Execution Reality for Level 1 Contractors

Operational Changes Required to Maintain CMMC Level 1 Compliance

CMMC Level 1 compliance is not achieved through paperwork alone. Contractors must make targeted operational changes to ensure safeguards are implemented, understood, and consistently enforced across FCI-handling systems. To remain compliant with FAR 52.204-21 and support accurate annual affirmation, organizations must operationalize the 15 safeguarding practices, not merely document them.

1

Policy & Procedure Documentation.

Written policies and procedures must exist for all 15 safeguards and accurately reflect how controls are implemented and enforced in practice.

2

Employee Cybersecurity Awareness.

Personnel with access to FCI must receive basic cybersecurity training to understand access restrictions, data handling expectations, and acceptable use requirements.

3

Technical Control Implementation.

Foundational IT safeguards such as access controls, authentication enforcement, endpoint protection, and boundary defenses must be active and verifiable.

4

Subcontractor Compliance Awareness.

Prime contractors are responsible for ensuring that FCI-handling subcontractors understand and meet Level 1 requirements where flow-down applies.

5

Optional FCI Enclaving.

Some organizations isolate systems handling FCI to reduce compliance scope while maintaining defensible protection boundaries.

CMMC Level 1 — Execution & Affirmation

Get CMMC Level 1 Compliance Done — Correctly, Defensibly, and On Record

If you handle Federal Contract Information (FCI) but no Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI), CMMC Level 1 still carries enforceable obligations under FAR 52.204-21. SecureITSM helps you implement safeguards, document evidence, and submit accurate SPRS affirmations with confidence without audits, consultants, or unnecessary operational burden.

Cui about