Secure Your CUI with Defense-Grade Precision

CMMC Level 2 Compliance for DoD Contractors — Built for CUI & DFARS 252.204-7012 Alignment

Achieve full NIST SP 800-171A and CMMC Level 2 control coverage with SecureITSM’s AgileDefend™ Framework, uniting GCC High tenant provisioning, Zero-Trust identity enforcement, Intune configuration baselines, Defender XDR telemetry, and Sentinel-driven evidence automation. Every safeguard is architected for CUI protection and continuous DFARS compliance.

DoD-Certified CUI Security & Compliance

Why CMMC Level 2 Compliance Is Critical for Protecting CUI - The Problems DoD Contractors Must Overcome

Level 2 compliance guarantees that all technical controls, workflows, and system configurations are fully documented, tested, and mapped to your SSP and POA&M. With mandatory third-party assessment (C3PAO) for most CUI contracts, Level 2 forms the backbone of your organization’s risk reduction, operational maturity, and long-term eligibility within the Defense Industrial Base (DIB).

1. Full Enforcement of All 110 NIST SP 800-171A Controls
arrow

Every control under NIST 800-171 becomes enforceable and auditable via assessment objectives in 800-171A. Contractors must prove encryption at rest and in transit, enforce MFA across all privileged and non-privileged identities, apply device compliance with conditional access, and ingest logs into a centralized SIEM. CMMC Level 2 also demands validated configuration baselines, identity segmentation, and continuous telemetry requirements many SMB environments were never designed to support.

2. NIST 800-171A Was Written for Mature Enterprises - Not Small Contractors
arrow
3. C3PAOs Validate Evidence, Not Statements or Intentions
arrow
4. Documentation Burden Is Significant
arrow
5. CMMC Requires Recurring Maturity, Not One Time Configurations
arrow
6. Tooling Requirements Are Expensive and Complex to Configure
arrow
7. GCC Migration Adds Architectural and Operational Complexity
arrow
8. C3PAO Assessments Are Deep, Technical, and Costly
arrow
9. Most SMB Contractors Lack the Required Cybersecurity Roles
arrow
10. Many Organizations Do Not Know Where CUI Originates, Moves, or Resides
arrow
11. DFARS 252.204-7012 Requires Telemetry, Forensics, and Audit Readiness
arrow
12. Full Audit Readiness Takes 6–12+ Months and Requires Cultural Change
arrow
CMMC Level 2 — Built, Validated, and Maintained

Complete CMMC Level 2 Execution Without Internal Overhead

SecureITSM’s AgileDefend™ Level 2 Framework delivers full-stack implementation, evidence automation, and pre-audit validation mapped to every NIST 800-171A objective and DFARS 252.204-7012 requirement. We provision GCC High, enforce Zero Trust access, and deploy all 110 technical controls with automated SSP and artifact generation. Every configuration is continuously validated through Sentinel telemetry, Defender XDR enforcement, and Entra ID identity governance ensuring provable, traceable, and audit-ready CMMC Level 2 compliance.

Internal overhead featured
1

Customer Business & IT Requirements Analysis

We first analyze each customer's unique business and their corresponding IT requirements. This eliminates environment configuration mismatches minimizing the time to be audit-ready.

2

Security Control Implementation & Zero Trust Enforcement

All 110 controls deployed across Microsoft GCC High, Intune, Defender, and Azure baseline policies, including data at rest encryption, log retention, key management, and identity segmentation.

3

Automated SSP, Policy & Evidence Generation

AgileDefend™ auto-produces every policy, procedure, and artifact linked directly to NIST control numbers, DFARS 7012 reporting, and SPRS score alignment.

4

Mock Audit & C3PAO Simulation

We operate full internal assessments including artifact review, objective validation, and auditor style questioning delivering a pre-validated environment before formal certification.

Defense-Grade Control Mapping & Enforcement

The Compliance Architecture Behind CMMC Level 2 Success - Fully Aligned with NIST, DFARS & CUI Protection

SecureITSM implements a live technical framework that proves CMMC Level 2 control execution. Every configuration, identity policy, and telemetry event is recorded, mapped, and retained for audit under DFARS 252.204-7012 requirements. Our automation process automatically correlates Sentinel logs, Defender alerts, and identity governance data into evidence-ready reporting by eliminating manual collection and audit guesswork.

Automated Evidence Engine

Control artifacts are automatically generated, timestamped, and version-tracked inside the AgileDefend™ Evidence Manager.

Every policy, log extract, and configuration proof includes change history, ensuring defensible audit trails for C3PAO validation.

JIT Privileged Identity Management

No administrator retains permanent privileges, all elevation requires approval, MFA, and time bound activation via Microsoft Entra PIM.

This delivers full traceability, eliminates standing credentials, and satisfies AC.2.007 and IA.2.078 requirements.

Sentinel Analytics for DFARS Reporting

Microsoft Sentinel correlation rules detect DFARS-relevant events and automatically enforce the 72-hour reporting obligation defined in 252.204-7012.

Alerts feed directly into SecureITSM SOC workflows, providing forensic evidence and notification logs.

Unified Control Scorecards

Every NIST 800-171 objective is tracked in a live pass/fail dashboard with linked evidence artifacts, remediation steps, and POA&M references.

Compliance leaders see instantly which controls are complete, in progress, or at risk with proof attached.

Compliance architecture
Protecting data
Zero-Trust Enforcement for Controlled Data Workflows

Protecting CUI Data at Every Stage of the Compliance Lifecycle

Our CUI Protection Stack applies identity-anchored encryption, sovereign cloud residency, and NIST-aligned data governance controls across every asset that touches CUI. From BitLocker-anchored device encryption to Sentinel-based exfiltration detection, every control is mapped back into the 800-171A assessment guide with live evidence capture.

  • 1. GCC Tenant Isolation.

    All CUI workload operate inside a Microsoft 365 GCC tenant, validated through domain ownership and Microsoft approval. Boundary controls prevent lateral data leakage, cross-tenant bleed, and unauthorized administrative access. All tenant configurations align with NIST 800-171a data residency and boundary restriction requirements.

  • 2. Zero-Trust Conditional Access.

    Identity access is continuously validated using device compliance posture, user risk scoring, and mandatory MFA. Microsoft Entra PIM enforces Just In Time administrative activation with no standing privileges, while adaptive policies respond dynamically to geo velocity anomalies, unmanaged devices, and session risk events.

  • 3. Purview Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Enforcement.

    CUI is automatically classified using Purview sensitivity labels that enforce encryption, retention, and granular sharing restrictions across Teams, SharePoint, OneDrive, and Exchange. Unauthorized downloads, forwarding, and external sharing are blocked at policy level with full audit snapshots preserved for evidence traceability.

  • 4. Cryptographic Control Mapping.

    All data at rest is encrypted using AES-256 with hardware-backed HSM key governance. TLS 1.2+ is enforced for all data in transit with continuous cipher validation and legacy protocol denial. Key rotation, cryptographic audit logs, and evidence snapshots are automatically archived and mapped to NIST 800-171A SC controls and DFARS 252.204-7012 technical requirements.

Protection stack

SOC-Integrated Continuous Compliance Enforcement

CMMC Controls Validated by Live Threat Telemetry

SecureITSM maintains live CMMC Level 2 compliance using continuous telemetry from Microsoft Sentinel, Defender XDR, and AgileDefend’s evidence engine. Every configuration change, policy enforcement, and security event is logged, correlated, and mapped to audit-required NIST 800-171A objectives. Compliance scores update in real time, ensuring no drift, blind spots, or undocumented deviations.

Continuous Compliance Dashboards

Continuous Compliance Dashboards

Real-time SSP-to-evidence coverage metrics, mapped to every CMMC control objective and continuously updated.

Sentinel Alert, Control Mapping

Sentinel Alert, Control Mapping

Every security alert is tagged to CMMC control families (AC, CM, IR, SI) enabling auditors to verify operational proof instantly.

Automated Evidence Correlation

Automated Evidence Correlation

Live ticket & SIEM data automatically link to DFARS 7012 and NIST 800-171A safeguards eliminating manual screenshot evidence.

Quarterly Validation & Review

Quarterly Validation & Review

SecureITSM conducts quarterly policy and evidence reviews, generating full POA&M updates and compliance score reports.

Implementation Results That Stand Up to Auditors

Proven Compliance Outcomes - Built, Validated & Verified Against Real DoD Audit Requirements

Our comprehensive CMMC approach delivers measurable benefits across all aspects of compliance and security.

Week Build Window

4 - 6

Standardized GCC High provisioning pipelines ensure deterministic control deployment with <5% configuration drift risk.

Threat Detection Efficiency

99.8%

XDR + SIEM + UEBA correlation ensures lateral movement, privilege abuse, and CUI exfiltration attempts are flagged within seconds.

Control Completion

100%

Each of the 110 controls is implemented, validated, evidence-mapped, and measured against NIST 800-171A objective test steps.

Response Time

< 15 Min

SOC playbooks, AIR automation, and Sentinel workflow actions ensure DFARS 7012 incident response time requirements.

Control Families Enforced

110

AC, AU, AT, CM, IA, IR, MA, MP, PE, PL, RA, RM, SA, SC, SI — fully validated and traceable inside SSP.

Monitoring Coverage

24×7

Identity, endpoint, cloud, and change control monitored continuously with compliance scoring dashboards.

Deploy, Harden, Validate, and Certify — All Within One Framework

Ready for Full-Stack CMMC Level 2 Enforcement?

SecureITSM delivers deterministic Level 2 compliance by implementing Zero Trust identity controls, Defender XDR telemetry, Sentinel logging pipelines, and evidence-bound SSP documentation. Every safeguard is mapped to NIST 800-171A assessment objectives and DFARS 252.204-7012 incident handling requirements. No theory , full technical enforcement with provable artifacts.

Enforcement featured